Why Is Ford V Ferrari Rated Pg 13?

Is Ford V Ferrari Kid Friendly? – Ford V Ferrari is rated PG-13 for language and peril. I would agree with the rating and recommend Ford V Ferrari for kids ages 13 and up. If you don’t mind language or some intense scenes, then younger kids may be ok. At 2 1/2 hours it can feel a little long, and you’ll need a mature movie-watcher to last through the entire film.
View full answer

Is Ford versus Ferrari OK for kids?

Ford v Ferrari Movie Review The parents’ guide to what’s in this movie. Drinking, Drugs & Smoking Not present Parents need to know that Ford v Ferrari (also known as Le Mans ’66 ) is a fact-based racing drama about events leading up to and including the 1966 24 Hours of Le Mans.

Starring and, it’s briskly paced and entertaining enough to appeal even to nonracing fans. But it does include car crashes, explosions, drivers on fire, and people dying. Characters also fight, punch, and wrestle, and there are some violent temper tantrums. Language is fairly strong, with uses of “f-k,” “s-t,” and more.

Era-appropriate brands are seen around the racetrack (Coppertone, Good Year, Budweiser, etc.). One character takes prescription medication for a heart condition, and there’s some background smoking. A married couple flirts briefly. October 2, 2022 Excellent depiction of endurance racing in the sixties and the risks taken, with all the fatal accidents and serious crashes.

1. However, the frequent strong language should have upped the rating from a PG-13 to R.
2. Do not allow your children to watch this.
3. Not to say this is a bad movie.
4. It is a great depiction of Ford’s overthrow of Ferrari’s dominance of endurance racing with the iconic GT40.
5. This title has: July 3, 2021 In FORD V FERRARI, race car driver Carroll Shelby () wins the 1959 24 Hours of Le Mans race but is forced to retire due to a heart condition.

Meanwhile, at the Ford Motor Company, Lee Iacocca () proposes that the company start making race cars as a way to improve their image with younger drivers. An attempt to partner with Ferrari goes south, so Ford hires Shelby to build their car. Shelby, in turn, hires Ken Miles (), a talented but volatile driver, to help work out the bugs.

• Henry Ford II () puts executive Leo Beebe () in charge of the racing division, and Beebe immediately sets out to get rid of Miles.
• But Miles and Shelby have an ace up their sleeve: They actually have the talent to win races and have their sights set on the 1966 Le Mans.
• Nevertheless, Beebe has one last weaselly plan.

This enjoyable fact-based racing movie runs a little long, but it manages to keep up a good, breezy pace, focusing more on pure entertainment than on trying to be dutifully “important.” At the heart of Ford v Ferrari are two fine performances by Damon and Bale, whose characters forge a touching friendship that’s based more on small gestures than on big demonstrations.

1. Miles is a show-off, but Bale makes him seem real, with relatable worries and outrages.
2. And Damon clearly enjoys his clever, quick-witted character, who still somehow makes genuine connections.
3. Just as good is playwright Letts as the stern, rocky second Henry Ford; he’s reduced to terrified screaming and joyful tears when Shelby takes him for a high-speed ride in his new car.

At the wheel, director gives Ford v Ferrari the crisp, confident energy of his best genre films, and (the latter of which also starred Bale), without letting it drift into the stodgy, awards-bait seriousness of his previous biopic, Ford v Ferrari is so simple and classic that it could have been sent here directly from the early 1960s.

Families can talk about Ford v Ferrari ‘s, How does it compare to what you might see in an action movie? What are the consequences? Do you think some people really watch racing just for the crashes? Does the movie glamorize racing? How exciting does it look? How dangerous? Are Shelby and Miles ? They’re both champions, but they’re also complex people with weaknesses and dark sides. Does this make them bad people? Why do you think there’s so much associated with racing? Does seeing a brand’s logo at the racetrack make you want to seek out a specific product? Could Henry Ford II be considered a ? How does Shelby handle him? What other ways are there of dealing with bullies?

: Ford v Ferrari Movie Review
View full answer

Is Ford vs Ferrari PG-13?

Ford v Ferrari | 2019 | PG-13 | – 2.5.5.
View full answer

Does Ford v Ferrari pass the Bechdel test?

Ford v Ferrari is about white guys, and that’s OK Ford v Ferrari i s a biopic about white guys, yet some people are complaining that it contains too many white guys. The film tells the (fictionalized) true story of car designer Carroll Shelby and driver Ken Miles, who collaborated to help Ford beat Ferrari at the 24 Hours of Le Mans in 1966.

They were both white guys, and this is a problem for Bloomberg writer Hannah Elliott. “This is a film celebrating those nostalgic golden days when white men ruled,” Elliott, “No fraction of the storyline is devoted to parsing the thoughts and feelings of any female who appears, even peripherally, on screen.” The film certainly doesn’t pass the so-called Bechdel test — the standard named for cartoonist Alison Bechdel that requires that two female characters in a film have a conversation about something other than a man.

A number of great films don’t pass it, from The Godfather to Casablanca, Of course, films might benefit from more female representation, but a biopic about car guys in the 1960s might not be the film for it. Elliott also complains that Ford v Ferrari celebrates Shelby, a notorious womanizer who enjoyed big game hunting and was sued for sexual harassment.

1. Shelby wasn’t really the benign if hardheaded creative that he’s shown to be in the film.
2. But to that criticism, the film wasn’t trying to portray the real Shelby, anyway.
3. Speaking as a director of actors, I’ve seen overly researching get majorly in the way,” director James Mangold at Ford v Ferrari ‘s world premiere.

“You aren’t playing the real person, you’re playing the character in service of the story.” Elliott isn’t the only one tired of seeing white guys on screen. Another review of Ford v Ferrari on the climate and social justice-oriented website Grist about the film’s “white masculinity” and calls it a “climate change horror film.” And Ford v Ferrari isn’t the only film with an alleged whiteness problem.

“In the American imagination, Bonnie and Clyde are always white,” Vox last week. “The new movie Queen and Slim reinvents this doomed love story, and challenges viewers to re-evaluate how they racialize the runaway lover trope.” Bonnie and Clyde are always white, it’s true, but that’s probably because the two notorious criminals were — wait for it — white.

Vox’s review of the new film Queen & Slim, which centers on a black couple who become fugitives after killing a racist cop, claims that the film is a retelling of Bonnie and Clyde, and that’s a good thing: It’s a subversive and powerful way to retell the Bonnie and Clyde myth for a new era — but also to reexamine what that myth has meant (something that Thelma and Louise’s feminist retelling did as well).

1. It was possible to shade the story of a gun-toting white couple on the run from the law as glamorous and electric, a symbol of freedom and rebellion on the open road.
2. But in the American imagination, that pair always had to be white, even if all the other details were fictionalized.
3. But the real Bonnie and Clyde were not heroes.

They were greedy killers who probably murdered more than a dozen people. As one Twitter user, “This isn’t exactly a victory for civil rights if this character archetype goes cross racial.” On-screen representation is not a frivolous concern, but sometimes the demands for superficial equality don’t even make sense.

Apollo 13 is also a movie mainly about white guys. So was The Imitation Game, Some movies are just about white people, and that’s that. So, when you complain that white guys are playing white guys, or that black actors haven’t had the opportunity to play villainous murderers, you might be taking social justice in the wrong direction.

: Ford v Ferrari is about white guys, and that’s OK
View full answer

What year is Ford vs Ferrari supposed to be?

Plot – In 1963, Ford Motor Company Vice President Lee Iacocca proposes to Henry Ford II to boost their car sales by purchasing Italian car manufacturer Ferrari, dominant in the 24 Hours of Le Mans, Owner Enzo Ferrari uses Ford’s offer to secure a deal with Fiat that allows him to retain ownership of the firm’s racing team, Scuderia Ferrari,

1. He insults Ford II and the whole Ford Motor Company.
2. Ford orders his racing division to build a car to defeat Ferrari at Le Mans.
3. Iacocca hires Shelby American owner Carroll Shelby, a retired driver who won Le Mans in 1959,
4. Shelby enlists his friend Ken Miles, a hot-tempered British racer and mechanic.

Shelby and Miles develop the UK-built Ford GT40 Mk I prototype at Los Angeles International Airport, At the launch of the new Ford Mustang, Miles gives a witheringly rude appraisal of it to Ford Senior Vice President Leo Beebe. Beebe campaigns against sending Miles to the 1965 24 Hours of Le Mans as a public relations liability.

1. Shelby reluctantly excludes Miles and sends Phil Hill and Bruce McLaren to Le Mans.
2. None of the Fords finish.
3. When Ford demands why he should not sack Shelby, Shelby explains that despite the GT40’s reliability problems, it instilled fear in Enzo Ferrari by reaching 218 mph (350.8 km/h ), on the Mulsanne Straight before breaking down.

He says a racing car cannot be designed by committee. Ford tells him to continue the project and report directly to him. During testing of the GT40 Mk II, the recurrent problem of brake fade causes a crash and fire. The team realizes the rules permit replacing the whole brake assembly during the race.

1. In 1966, Beebe takes over the racing division.
2. When he and Ford arrive to inspect the program Shelby locks Beebe in his office and terrifies Ford in a ride in the GT40.
3. Shelby makes a deal with Ford: if Miles wins the 24 Hours of Daytona then he will race at Le Mans.
4. If not, Ford will take full ownership of Shelby American.

At Daytona, Beebe enters a second GT40 supported by a NASCAR team with quicker pit stops. Shelby clears Miles to push his car beyond the 7,000 RPM redline, and he wins. At the 1966 24 Hours of Le Mans, Miles struggles with a faulty door during the first lap.

He pits to fix it then sets lap records catching the Ferraris. The GT40 suffers brake fade while dicing with the prototype 330 P3 Ferrari of Lorenzo Bandini, so Miles limps into the pits for replacement of the entire braking system. Ferrari protests but Shelby assures race officials it is legal. Miles and Bandini duel on the Mulsanne Straight until the Ferrari engine blows.

With Fords in the top three positions, Beebe orders Shelby to have Miles slow down for the other Fords to catch him and give the press a three-car photo finish, Shelby tells Miles what Beebe wants but says it is Miles’ call. Miles initially continues to set new lap records, but decides to comply on the final lap.

McLaren is declared the winner as, having started behind Miles, his car travelled further overall. Miles is placed second. Shelby accuses Beebe of deliberately costing Miles the win, but an unusually sanguine Miles lets it pass, saying to Shelby “you promised me the drive, not the win”. From his vantage point Enzo Ferrari tips his hat to Miles on the track.

As they walk off together, Miles tells Shelby they will win Le Mans next time. Two months later, during testing at Riverside International Raceway, a mechanical failure in the J-car kills Miles in a crash. Six months later, Shelby parks outside pays Miles’ widow Mollie’s house and hesitates.
View full answer

How many F words are in Ford vs Ferrari?

There are a couple of f-words, at least 30 uses of sh–, 3 uses of bit–, 8 uses of damn, 4 uses of a-hole, 4 others uses of a–, 13 uses of hell (mostly as in bloody hell), and 8 uses of g-ddammit.
View full answer

Can kids ride in Ferrari?

Kid-Friendly Ferraris Adam Merlin, President at Merlin Auto Group, confidently answers, “Every time I speak about Ferraris being kid friendly, people think I’m nuts. And for the most part, I am. After all, even Ferraris that do have back seats often require the rear passenger to sacrifice leg room, so you can imagine peoples’ reactions when I allude to fitting car seats back there.

1. However, after trying a plethora of Ferrari models, I can confidently say there are models you can choose from, if you have a family and still want to spoil yourself by driving a Ferrari.” Some might say the California is the most driveable Ferrari out there.
2. There is some truth to that–from a practicality and driveability standpoint, it is a terrific daily driver.However, the backseat can be a tight squeeze depending on the height of the driver, so some adjustments might be in order where height is concerned.

Car seats and booster seats can also prove to be a bit of a challenge, given that the back seats are slightly more narrow than other Ferrari models, but it is absolutely doable. All that being said, the California is still a great family car–it’s practical, driveable, safe and comfortable– though it is important, however, to manage any expectations that the California would fulfill the same purpose as a minivan. The even better news is, you can also choose a 612 or a 456 and still get an affordable Ferrari with a back seat. There is a bit more backseat space in these models and also in the trunk as compared to the California. Both cars have V12 Performance so there will be absolutely no sacrifice in the performance arena with one of these Ferraris.

1. However, considering all the Ferrari models, most would agree the most kid and family-friendly Ferrari out there is the FF.
2. Some call it a station wagon, some call it a hatchback, and some just call it ugly, but with 600+hp, AWD handling capability, and a dual clutch transmission that shifts fast as lightning, this is the best family Ferrari on the road.

The trunk space is great, access to the rear seats is easy, and most importantly any size adult can fit comfortably so your children should have no problem. This has so much room in the back seat, you will often forget you are in an exotic sports carthat is, until you step on the gas pedal. : Kid-Friendly Ferraris
View full answer

Was the Ford GT40 a Lola?

The British Sports Car That Became Ford’s Famed GT40 The most important person in the history of the Le Mans-conquering Ford GT40 race car just might be Enzo Ferrari. When the Italian walked away from a deal to sell his company to Ford, Henry Ford II issued an edict to his engieers: Build me a car that will crush Ferrari at the world’s premiere race.

1. If Ferrari is the most important guy, Eric Broadley just might be the second.
2. He owned Lola Cars, the British racing outfit that stuffed a V8 engine into a mid-engine race car just 40 inches tall and performed admirably at the 24 Hours of Le Mans in 1963 (until a mechanical problem knocked it out).
3. Ford bought the design, hired Broadley to bolster its racing program, and made the 1963 Lola Mk 6 the basis of the GT40.

It worked beautifully. The won Le Mans every year from 1966—when it swept the podium—to 1969. The GT40 is an icon, and Ford has on a few occasions resurrected the moniker for limited-edition, big-money supercars. The latest that you must apply for the right to buy one.
View full answer

Is Ford vs Ferrari on Disney +?

Car designer Carroll Shelby and fearless driver Ken Miles take on Enzo Ferrari in Le Mans in 1966.
View full answer

Is Ford vs Ferrari hit or flop?

Box Office: ‘Ford v Ferrari’ Petering Out After Failing To Crack $200,000 HOLLYWOOD, CA – NOVEMBER 04: Christian Bale and Matt Damon arrive for the Premiere Of FOX’s “Ford V, Ferrari” held at TCL Chinese Theatre on November 4, 2019 in Hollywood, California.

• Photo by Albert L.
• Ortega/Getty Images) Getty Images After 14 admirable weeks at the box office, it seems as though Ford v Ferrari ‘s theater run is finally coming to an end after posting a $170,000 weekend.
• To be exact, the Matt Damon/Christian Bale vehicle only mustered $171,643 from Feb.21-23—a staggering 53.7% drop from the previous weekend’s $370,561 showing.

Considering Ford v Ferrari just hit DVD/Blu-ray/4K and streaming platforms this past month, that news shouldn’t be too surprising. Still, it does mean that the film for which Christian Bale received his fifth Academy Award nomination has pretty much disappeared from movie theaters.

This past weekend, Ford v Ferrari only appeared in 214 venues. That’s only a 79-theater dip from the previous weekend, but the film’s per-theater average dropped from $1,264 to just over $800. Thus, all signs signal that the film has experienced its final days in theaters. ADVERTISEMENT While the film had a $98 million budget, the worldwide run for Ford v Ferrari has been more lucrative than one would have imagined, considering it was an original film largely aimed at adult audiences.

On opening weekend the Matt Damon movie roared to a $31.5 million domestic start, pulling in a $8,921 average from 3,528 theaters. From there, the James Mangold film nominated for Best Picture at the 92nd Academy Awards sustained a surprisingly healthy, headstrong run.

• The second weekend only saw a 50% dip and brought the movie’s 10-day total to a commendable $57.7 million.
• In total, it only took Ford v Ferrari 35 days to eclipse the $100 million mark.
• From there, it was a slow and steady week-over-week declining march towards the film’s current domestic total of $117.4 million.

Ford v Ferrari certainly got a healthy boost the weekend after the announcement of its Best Picture nomination and Christian Bale’s nomination at the Oscars, with weekend revenue shooting up to over $1 million once again from Jan.17-19. ADVERTISEMENT But after that showing, theater count was on the slow and steady decline from there on out.

1. From Jan.24-26, the Matt Damon film only showed in 804 venues.
2. Then that total dipped below 300 by Valentine’s Day.
3. Internationally, Ford v Ferrari also had a healthy run, coming in at $107.9 million in total.
4. Considering it was an automobile-themed film, it’s not very surprising that most of that revenue came from European countries.

Specifically: France ($9.8 million), the United Kingdom ($8.1 million), Germany ($4 million) and Italy ($3.3 million). The film also managed to pull in $11.2 million from Russia, $10.6 million from South Korea and $7.2 million from Australia. In total, Ford v Ferrari ‘s global cume stands at just over $225 million.
View full answer

How many Disney movies fail the Bechdel Test?

Disney films are a huge cornerstone of nearly everyone’s childhood. Whether you grew up watching stories of princesses and their all-powerful, fearless princes, or depictions of inanimate objects such as cars and their tumultuous races to victory despite tragic obstacles along their way, chances are you’ve spent at least some weekday afternoons curled up on the couch with your favorite youth-affirming Disney film.

Yet, no matter how timeless these films are, it is important that we analyze our media in terms of how, exactly, it is reflecting our society. A fantastic way to look back on our favorite films and promote progressive analysis is to use the Bechdel test. The Bechdel test, also known as the Bechdel-Wallace test, is ” a simple test which names the following three criteria: (1) it has to have at least two women in it, who (2) talk to each other, (3) about something besides a man,” With these criteria, many movies have been statistically categorized based on their representation of women and, thus, a great deal of cinematic history has been reanalyzed through the lens of feminist rhetoric.

While there are many lists reporting which films pass and which films fail the Bechdel test, there is a much less-lofty amount of material on the subject of Disney films in relation to the Bechdel test. Through research, both on and off the screen, I compiled a list of favorite Disney movies in relation to their respective scores on the Bechdel test.

Though movies that fail are still merited in their content and hold strong fanbases, it is important that we begin to notice these patterns of female representation (or lack thereof) —understanding how femininity is portrayed, especially in thematic universes made for children, can severely alter how femininity is perceived throughout all of society as a whole.

Moving forward, and after reading the ‘pass’ and ‘fail’ list of Disney films below, try using the Bechdel test while watching any film. Not only can this simple tool break down a filmmaker’s ability to portray women well, but it can explain a lot of ‘hollowness’ in character development, or, furthermore, why some films just hit while others completely miss,

DISCLAIMER: The Bechdel test does not always classify a film as ‘feminist’ or ‘antifeminist’. While it can be a great tool, it is not the end all be all, and relies solely on the interactions and relationships between women in film. PASS: Alice in Wonderland, The Aristocrats, Beauty and the Beast, Bolt, Brave, A Bug’s Life, Cars, Cinderella, The Emperor’s New Groove, Frozen, Hercules, The Incredibles, Lilo and Stitch, Peter Pan, Pocahontas, The Princess and the Frog, Sleeping Beauty, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Tangled, Toy Story 3, Wreck-It-Ralph FAIL: Aladdin, Bambi, Brother Bear, Dumbo, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, The Jungle Book, Lady and the Tramp, The Lion King, The Little Mermaid, Meet the Robinsons, Monsters, Inc., Mulan, Pinocchio, Ratatouille, Tarzan, Toy Story, Toy Story 2, Up, WALL-E Of course, this is not a comprehensive list, but out of the 40 films referenced, only 19 failed the Bechdel test, making for a solid 52.5% pass rate in Disney films.

I’m sure, of course, that this number would likely go down if I analyzed all Disney films, specifically including some from the early decades, but at least in terms of recent years, this percentage is not too disappointing. Next time you sit down to watch a Disney movie, or any movie in general, try the Bechdel test.

Though it won’t immediately decide whether the feminist rhetoric is on par with the work we hope to see in contemporary film, it is a great way to bring awareness to the portrayal of woman and female-centric tropes, and an even better way to understand how, exactly, a film is portraying its female protagonists.

Sources: https://disney-blog.com/2011/05/the-bechdel-test-and-disney-films/ https://www.hercampus.com/school/ucsb/so-how-many-disney-movies-pass-bechdel-test/
View full answer

How many movies fail the Bechdel Test?

Hollywood’s Gender Divide and its Effect on Films Examining the Gender of Writers, Producers, and Directors Who Make films that fail the Bechdel Test There’s this thing called the Bechdel Test, It measures just how male-dominated our beloved Netflix nights really are.

• To pass, films need to satisfy three requirements: #1 It has at least two women in it #2 Who talk to each other, about #3 Something besides a man It’s a low bar, but many good movies don’t pass.
• Birdman fails.
• Avatar fails.
• Fucking Toy Story fails.
• On bechdeltest.com, a site for crowdsourcing Bechdel Test results, about 40% of films don’t pass.

It’s a sad state since women exist in life, like, half the time. Why? Rather than generalize a sexist system, one theory is simple: filmmakers, unintentionally, make movies about themselves (i.e., write what you know). Since the most powerful producers, writers, and directors are men, male-themes permeate into Hollywood’s output.

To see if women are more likely to write about women (i.e., pass the Bechdel test), we compiled the genders of the producers, writers, and directors on thousands of films. First, let’s examine the screenwriters’ gender for 200 films that we know and love. The 200 Highest Grossing Films: Bechdel Test Results and Gender Diversity of the Writing Team #1 Film has at least two women in it #2 Who talk to each other, about #3 Something besides a man.

Box Office is inflation-adjusted and includes films 1995 – 2015*. Test results via bechdeltest.com, More on methodology here,53% Fails Test 47% Passes Test Films with an All-Male Writing Team
 38% Fails Test 62% Passes Test At Least One Woman Writer
 All Women Writers
 0% Fails 100% Passes *We looked at films only over the past 20 years to control for progress in gender diversity.

That is, in the 50s, we expect men to make a predominate number of films due to low participation of women in the workforce, overall. Male vs. Female Decision-Makers and the Bechdel Test When writing teams are entirely male, about 50% of films fail the Bechdel test. Add a woman to the mix and only a third of films fail.

The seven films written entirely by women all pass the Bechdel test. Uncanny, right? That’s a small sample: only 200 movies. So let’s look at every film (about 4,000 movies) rated on bechdeltest.com. Percent of Films that Fail the Bechdel Test, Based on Gender Composition of Writers, Producers, and Directors 4,000 films via bechdeltest.com, 1995 – 2015 Girls, we do not, in fact, run this mother.

Men are pervasive in startups, CEOs, engineering, politics – Hollywood is no exception. But in Hollywood, it’s plainly visible in the product. When men make films, what’s on-screen reflects the behind-the-scenes brotopia. There are plenty of flaws with the Bechdel Test, but it’s a crude way to measure the inclusiveness of a film (and we have 4,000 films rated on the metric).

The fact that a filmmaker’s gender correlates with the test, we can stop arguing about the merits of the Bechdel Test and start discussing Hollywood’s diversity problem (i.e., 85% of filmmakers are men.more on this later). Here’s each of the films that we examined and the (mostly-male) individuals involved: Films that Fail the Bechdel Test and the Creators’ Gender 4,000 films via bechdeltest.com, 1995 – 2015.

Box Office is Inflation-adjusted. More on methodology here, When a Film’s. Writers View All Are Only Men Have At Least 1 Woman Have 2+ Women Are Only Women Producers View All Are Only Men Have At Least 1 Woman Have 2+ Women Are Only Women Directors View All Are Male Are Female Filter All $ Box Office $ To Pass, Film Satisfies Three Basic Requirements: #1 it has at least two women in it #2 Who talk to each other, about #3 Something besides a man 18 fail and 40 pass = Fails Bechdel Test = Passes Bechdel Test Films that Don’t Meet your Filter Criteria ( 46% of our 4,000 Film Dataset) When a film’s.

Writers: Male Producer: Male Director: Male Why Inclusiveness Matters When women are not visible on-screen, we reinforce stereotypes off-screen. Hollywood is promoting a culture of female invisibility, where women can’t save the planet, win the big game, or fight the bad.wait for it.

Guy, Instead, they’re props who can only gab about men. Here’s a look at the individuals creating such films: the most prolific directors, producers, and writers in Hollywood. Bechdel Test Results for Notable Producers, Directors, and Writers Bechdel Test Results via bechdeltest.com for films 1995 – 2015 Top Producers Top Directors Top Writers Good Will Hunting It’s important to call out the studios.

They make, buy, and distribute films. For example, while the new Star Wars sequel was boss (with Rey and Finn as leads!), Lucasfilms hasn’t had the best track record: 4 out of 7 Star Wars fail the Bechdel Test. Studios and the Percent of Films that Fail the Bechdel Test Companies with Over 25 Films Rated on bechdeltest.com, 1995 – 2015 European studios are far more progressive than the US.

France is killing it. Canal+ has about 200 films in our dataset, and a low 34% fail the Bechdel Test. US studios are a relative embarrassment: Warner Bros. (53% fail), Columbia (53% fail), and DreamWorks (55%). Even more depressing? When we compiled the gender of each producer, director, and writer on these films.

Men outnumbered women 5:1. Of the 4,500 directors, only 500 were women. When we sort the data by a film’s popularity, it’s even worse: Writers for 4,000 films, sorted by Box Office Revenue 1995 – 2015, Box Office is Inflation-adjusted 4:1 Men 5:1 6:1 8:1 8:1 Men $0-$10M $11-$50M $51-$100M $101-$500M $500M+ Directors for 4,000 films, sorted by Box Office Revenue 1995 – 2015, Box Office is Inflation-adjusted 5:1 Men 9:1 11:1 23:1 22:1 Men $0-$10M $11-$50M $51-$100M $101-$500M $500M+ When there is a woman on the team, it’s typically on small-market indie films.

On blockbusters, Hollywood has fewer women directors per capita than the military has female generals, Whether or not there’s unconscious bias against women, things aren’t changing. Films made in 1995, on average, failed the Bechdel Test 37% of the time. Today? 38%. Films made in 1995 had about 18% women in director, producer, and writing roles.

Today? 17%. One potential solution was recently proposed by Spike Lee: implement something akin to the NFL’s Rooney Rule, To slow-down the automatic white-guy hire, NFL teams must interview minority candidates for coaching positions. Hollywood should do the same: mandatory interviews for one person of color and one woman for every showrunner / director / writer / producer position.

1. Something is keeping these numbers from moving.
2. Until they change, we’re left with films lacking the depth of so many new perspectives.
3. Real life passes the Bechdel test; our imagined world can, too.
4. Thinking about who should helm a film? Try our Bechdel Test Simulator first.
5. A BECHDEL TEST SIMULATOR: MAKE A MOVIE THAT PASSES Likelihood of Failing the Bechdel Test 0% Methodology : first we scraped every film from bechdeltest.com.

Then we looked at the release year using IMDB, filtering out anything before 1995. From there, we grabbed the producer, director, and writer via IMDB’s cast info. We ignored inconsequential producers (e.g., line producers) or writers (e.g., character writers).

1. Then came the fun part: we used IMDB bios to gender tag producers, writers, and directors based on frequently occurring pronouns.
2. This wasn’t perfect, since films like Her create false positives.
3. From there, we assigned gender based on first name (e.g., Michaels = “male”).
4. This left about 8% of the data without any gender tagging, which unfortunately throws off the data slightly.

If you see an egregious error, send it to us at [email protected], “69 of the 976 generals and admirals, 7.1%, were women” via CNN in 2013. For films with revenue over $500M+, 1995 – 2015, 10 of the 225 directors, 4.4%, were women.
View full answer

Did all 3 Fords cross at the same time?

Questioning the Story: Did Ford almost buy Ferrari? Yes. In the early 1960s, Henry Ford II’s love for car racing was part of the reason that he decided that the Ford Motor Company would start competing. The other part had to do with the fact that Ford needed a marketing boost in the face of slipping sales and stiff competition from GM, especially when it came to attracting younger buyers.

The only problem was that Ford didn’t have a sports racing car in its fleet. By 1963, Henry Ford II (the grandson and namesake of the company’s founder) decided that the quickest way to get Ford on the racetrack would be to buy Ferrari. Ford sent a group of dealmakers to Modena, Italy to hash out a deal with Enzo Ferrari, which took months of meticulous negotiation.

The negotiations are expedited for the sake of the movie. The Ford v Ferrari true story reveals that Ford’s offer was $10 million. At first, Enzo Ferrari agreed to the deal, but there was a clause in the contract which stated that Ford would control the racing budget (and in turn the decisions).

1. Enzo Ferrari (also known as “Il Commendatore”) couldn’t handle the idea that anyone else would control the decisions regarding his race team, so he bailed on the deal.
2. Ferrari using Ford to leverage more money out of Fiat is fiction.
3. Fiat didn’t buy a stake in Ferrari until early 1969, well after Ford’s first Le Mans win.

It’s true that an angry Henry Ford II sought revenge by directing his company’s finances toward putting together a racing team and building a sports car that could beat Ferrari, specifically at the most prestigious car race in the world, the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

Henry Ford II (left) became determined to beat Ferrari at Le Mans after Enzo Ferrari (right) backed out of Ford’s offer to buy his company. What is the 24 Hours of Le Mans? First held in 1923, the 24 Hours of Le Mans, which takes place in the town of Le Mans, France, sets itself apart because instead of being a fixed-distance sports car race that awards the win to the car with the minimum time, the 24 Hours of Le Mans gives the win to the car that covers the greatest distance in a span of exactly 24 hours.

Like in the film, one of the biggest challenges is to create a car that will have the endurance to last the full 24 hours without mechanical failure. Did Carroll Shelby stop racing because of heart problems? Yes. Shelby (portrayed by Matt Damon) had been only the third American driver to ever win at Le Mans, co-driving an Aston Martin DBR1 (with Englishman Roy Salvadori) to victory in 1959.

• A Ford v Ferrari fact check confirms that a life-threatening heart ailment, angina pectoris, prompted Shelby to retire as a race car driver.
• Like in the movie, he was prescribed nitroglycerin tablets.
• He also wanted to put his focus into building cars.
• He received a heart transplant several decades later in 1990.

It’s true that part of the reason Carroll Shelby (left) retired from race car driving was due to a heart condition. Matt Damon (right) as Shelby in the movie. Did Ken Miles really drive tanks during WWII? Yes. At the start of WWII, Christian Bale’s real-life counterpart, Ken Miles, was posted to an anti-aircraft unit.

• He then worked in machinery, and in 1942, he was promoted to staff sergeant.
• He participated in the 1944 D-Day landings as part of a tank unit.
• Motor Sport As for his wife Mollie (Caitriona Balfe) and son Peter (Noah Jupe) in the movie, they’re indeed based on his real-life wife and son, Mollie Miles and Peter Miles.

Were the early versions of the Ford GT40 really that dangerous? Yes. The Ford GT40s (they stood just 40 inches high) that competed at Le Mans in 1964 and 1965 were far from perfect. While exploring how accurate Ford v Ferrari is, we learned that Ford failed to finish the race both years.

1. Though the cars were fast, they broke down.
2. Gearboxes failed, head gaskets blew, and the front brake rotors heated up to 1,500 degrees in seconds and stopping working.
3. The aerodynamics were also dangerously bad.
4. At over 200 mph, the cars developed so much lift they’d encounter wheelspin.
5. While test driving the vehicles in 1964, two aerodynamically unstable GT40s crashed.

The accidents prompted Ford test driver Roy Salvadori to quit. “I opted out of that program to save my life,” he commented. -Popular Mechanics Was Ford involved in the making of the Ford v Ferrari movie? No. Other than providing certain archival materials for research, Ford didn’t participate in the production of the film.

The movie is based on A.J. Baime’s 2009 book Go Like Hell: Ford, Ferrari and Their Battle for Speed and Glory at Le Mans, Go Like Hell by A.J. Baime provided the basis for the Ford v Ferrari movie. Does the Ford v Ferrari movie omit some of the races? Yes. “There were more races than we could track.” said director James Mangold of Ford v Ferrari ‘s historical accuracy.

“Growing up watching sports movies, I didn’t want to have to montage my way through seven or eight races as opposed to really landing in one.” Mangold said that omitting some of the earlier races was necessary because he wanted to have time to accurately communicate the idea of a 24-hour race and how hard it was on the vehicles and the men.

1. The only way to communicate that is to not do the 24-hour race in 11 minutes.
2. We’re making Saving Private Ryan in reverse.
3. We watch 90 minutes of drama, then go to war.
4. The race itself is almost an hour, an immersion.” -IndieWire Were Carroll Shelby and Ken Miles really as integral to the development of Ford’s GT40 race car? Not exactly.

The Ford v Ferrari movie depicts automotive designer Carroll Shelby (Matt Damon) and British driver Ken Miles (Christian Bale) as mavericks who fight corporate interference, namely from Ford’s racing director, Leo Beebe (Josh Lucas). In order to create a more compelling story around its two main characters, Shelby and Miles, the movie largely omits the vast cast of participants who were responsible for the success of the GT40 at the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

A Ford v Ferrari fact check reveals that in addition to Shelby and Miles, many other talented Ford employees and contractors worked to solve the complex set of engineering hurdles in an impossibly tight time frame. This included the Ford bureaucrats at the Dearborn, Michigan headquarters, nicknamed the Glass House.

Driver Ken Miles (left) at Le Mans in 1966 and Christian Bale (right) as Miles in the movie. Photos: The Henry Ford / 20th Century Fox Did Carroll Shelby take Henry Ford II for a heart-pounding ride? No. The Ford v Ferrari true story reveals that it was actually Ken Miles (Christian Bale’s character) who took Ford for a wild ride.

1. There’s no record of Ford crying, which is fiction.
2. Shelby also never locked Leo Beebe in an office while Ford was being taken for a ride.
3. IndieWire Did Dan Gurney have to push his car across the finish line at Sebring in 1966? Yes.
4. Though it’s not in the movie, investigating the true story confirms that this actually happened.

Gurney’s car expired on the final corner and Ken Miles passed him, taking first place. Gurney then pushed his car across the finish line. His son, Alex Gurney, also a racer, portrays him in the Ford v Ferrari movie. Did Ford perfect the GT40’s engine by running it on a dynamometer that simulated Le Mans? Yes.

To guarantee that the engines would last at the 24 Hours of Le Mans, Ford ran them on a dynamometer (an instrument that measures the power output of an engine) controlled by a program that simulated durability and performance. Computer-controlled servo actuators then ran or “drove” the engine just as it would be driven at Le Mans, complete with pit stops that included shut downs.

An engine was run until it exploded, at which time the engineers would address the problem and start the process over until their design was able to last back-to-back Le Mans simulations. The result was a robust 427-cubic-inch V-8 engine. -Popular Mechanics Did all of the races in the movie actually happen in real life? No.

During our exploration into Ford v Ferrari ‘s historical accuracy, we learned that the race at Willow Springs Raceway in California never actually happened in real life. It was created to help develop the personalities and relationship of race-team leader Carroll Shelby (Matt Damon) and his driver Ken Miles (Christian Bale).

-Car and Driver Ford driver Ken Miles (left) and actor Christian Bale as Miles (right). Did the Ford bureaucrats, including racing head Leo Beebe, refuse to send Ken Miles to Le Mans in 1965? No. The conflict between Ken Miles and the Ford bureaucrats is played up significantly in the movie, in addition to Miles’ hot temper.

• Historically, there wasn’t nearly as much push-back from Ford regarding Ken Miles competing at Le Mans.
• Unlike what’s seen in the movie, Miles did go to Le Mans in 1965, losing to Ferrari.
• He was forced to stop due to gearbox failure.
• Did Carroll Shelby bet his business on Ken Miles winning a race? No.

Carroll Shelby never bet Henry Ford II his entire business so that Ken Miles could drive at Le Mans. Ford’s right hand Leo Beebe (portrayed by Josh Lucas) did object to risks that Ken Miles took on the track, but the tension between Shelby and Beebe in the movie is significantly dramatized.

Shelby also never carried a sign over to the shoulder of the track that read, “7,000+ go like hell.” Did Henry Ford II hand racing division head Leo Beebe a handwritten note that said, “You better win.”? Yes. Not included in the movie, this happened several weeks before the 24 Hours of Le Mans endurance race.

Ford wrote the message on a business card and handed it to Beebe, who kept it in his wallet for the rest of his life. In the film, Leo Beebe is portrayed by Josh Lucas. What year did Ford finally beat Ferrari at Le Mans? The Ford GT40 brought Ferrari’s dominance at Le Mans to an end in 1966, when the Ford GT40 Mark IIs captured first, second and third place.

• Ford also took the top spot at Le Mans the following three years – 1967, 1968 and 1969.
• Factory support was withdrawn after the 1967 win.
• Privately owned GT40s captured the top spot in ’68 and ’69.
• Top: The Ford GT40 Mark II at Le Mans in 1966.
• Bottom: The movie version of the GT40 Mark II at Le Mans.
• Was Enzo Ferrari at Le Mans? No.

“The biggest cheat in this movie: Ferrari never showed up at Le Mans,” says director James Mangold. “I insistently put him there. I couldn’t stand the idea of cutting to the kid and mom and Ferrari on the phone or on radios, I couldn’t do it. Sorry, history!” As for Henry Ford II, he was present at Le Mans.

IndieWire Are the movie’s racing scenes real or CGI? The film’s intense racing footage is 100% real with no computer generated effects. One of the only things that is CGI is the shots of the crowd, due to the enormous size of the audience, which would have been difficult to recreate. Were the real-life cars that competed at Le Mans used in the movie? No.

The cars that still exist are worth millions and are far too valuable to be used in a movie. Instead, period-correct replicas were built for the film, including the Le Mans-winning Ford GT40s and Ferrari 330 P3s. The Ford GT40 that takes first place at Le Mans in the movie is a Superformance GT40 Mk II replica that was borrowed from Shelby collector William Deary.

1. It is an exact copy of the original (pictured below), both inside and out.
2. The real Ford GT40 Mark II driven by Ken Miles at the 24 Hours of Le Mans in 1966.
3. Did Ford win the 1966 Le Mans because of brakes? To a large degree, yes.
4. Ford engineer Phil Remington (portrayed by Ray McKinnon) came up with a brake system that would allow the pit crew to quickly swap out the pads and rotors during a driver change.

This meant that brakes would no longer have to be run beyond their limits. The Ford v Ferrari true story confirms that the other teams indeed cried foul, complaining that it gave Ford an unfair advantage, but there was no rule against it. -Popular Mechanics Own a replica Ken Miles/Denny Hulme 1966 Ford GT40 Mark II #1 Le Mans 1:18 diecast.

Is the finish of the race at the end of Ford v Ferrari based on the true story? Yes. Video and photos exist of the three Ford race cars finishing together at the 24 Hours of Le Mans race. It’s true that Ken Miles had been minutes ahead of the other cars, but due to self-serving instructions from Ford, combined with a technicality, Miles was given second place instead of first.

Ford management had indeed instructed him to slow down so that all three of their cars could cross the finish line together. Miles wasn’t as outraged over the idea as he is in the movie. In an effort to please the company he worked for, he let off the gas.

It is believed that despite team orders, Bruce McLaren accelerated just ahead of Miles at the last moment in an attempt to finish in the top spot (in the film, all three cars cross at the same time). Even if Ken Miles had been slightly ahead or tied with McLaren when the race ended, the fact that he obeyed orders from Ford and slowed down is what cost him the win.

This is because race officials ruled that since Bruce McLaren and Chris Amon started the race further back, they therefore covered a greater distance in the same time. The bungled photo finish resulted in Ken Miles being denied the coveted chance of winning Sebring, Daytona, and Le Mans all in the same year.

Unlike in the movie, Carroll Shelby admitted to being involved in ordering the three Ford cars to cross together, a decision he regretted for the rest of his life because of what it cost Ken Miles. Top: The three Ford GT40s approaching the finish line at Le Mans. Bottom: Bruce McLaren (left) finishes just ahead of fellow Ford driver Ken Miles (portrayed by Christian Bale).

How much money did Ford spend trying to win Le Mans? It’s estimated that Ford spent no less than $25 million on its effort to win at the 24 Hours of Le Mans (some have put the estimate around $100 million). After their 1966 and 1967 wins, Ford burned another $1 million preparing for the 1968 race, but then decided to withdraw financial support from the racing division (private GT40 owners won in ’68 and ’69).

• Today, companies still spend big amounts on their race teams.
• During Audi’s recent span of victories at Le Mans, they invested approximately $250 million per year on their race team.
• Ferrari reportedly pumps $500 million per year into its Formula One program.
• While Ferrari offers street-legal versions of their cars largely to fund their racing program, it’s harder for companies like Audi or Toyota to justify the expense, since their car sales arguably are not dependent on their racing programs.

Did Ken Miles die shortly after the 1966 Le Mans race? Yes. Ken Miles, who is portrayed by Christian Bale in the film, died two months after the 1966 Le Mans. He was killed during a freak accident while test driving the Ford J-car, which was to be the successor to the Ford GT40 Mk II.

Miles was approaching the 1-mile, downhill back straight at the Riverside International Raceway in Southern California, going over 200 mph. Rear end lift caused the car to loop, flip, crash and catch fire, breaking into pieces and ejecting Miles. He died instantly. The real Ken Miles (left) after a win (prior to Le Mans) and actor Christian Bale (right) celebrating in the movie.

Photos: The Henry Ford / 20th Century Fox
View full answer

Why didn’t Ken Miles win?

‘Ford v Ferrari’ Fact Check: Did Le Mans ’66 Really End That Way? (This post contains SPOILERS for “Ford v Ferrari,” starring Matt Damon and Christian Bale.) A good chunk of James Mangold’s “Ford v Ferrari” is devoted to a diligent recreation of the 1966 24 Hours of Le Mans race, and it all leads to a climax that, if you don’t know anything about it, feels almost too strange to be real.

Though, admittedly, it is fitting as the conclusion of a story that’s all about corporate meddling. The real life Le Mans ’66 ended with a historic finish: Ford trounced the frontrunner Ferrari as all three Ford cars crossed the finish line in a dead heat. But there’s some additional drama in the “Ford v Ferrari” portrayal.

In the film’s telling, once it becomes clear Ford will win, Ford executives, including Henry Ford II, realize that having all of its cars finish at the same time would make an excellent PR stunt — so they instruct driver Ken Miles (Bale) to slow down his pace to let the other two cars catch up.

The move achieves the desired photo opp, but Miles loses the championship he deserved on a technicality. Le Mans rules hold that in the event of a dead heat finish, the car that drove the furthest distance is the official winner regardless of overall standings in the race. And since the Ford car driven by Bruce McLaren and Chris Amon started the race eight meters (roughly 60 feet) behind Miles (who was in the pole position), Miles is declared the second place driver.

Also Read: But how close does the film’s depiction of Le Mans ’66 match with the real life events? Pretty close, as it turns out. Believe it or not, “Ford v Ferrari” doesn’t really take very many dramatic liberties. That glorious, and Miles really did lose his first place ranking on that frustrating technicality.

It’s all spelled out in the documentary “8 Meters: Triumph, Tragedy and a Photo Finish at Le Mans,” which you can watch above. In it, you can even hear the real audio from the day of the race (around the 17:15 mark) of the announcer explaining to the crowd what had just happened. “8 Meters” shows that there was genuine confusion among the drivers as to who actually won the race.

And when Miles figured out what happened, he was devastated.

“I think we’ve been f—ed,” Miles is quoted in the documentary telling his crew chief. Also Read: Carroll Shelby, who is played by Damon in “Ford v Ferrari,” also said he wished he never agreed to the dead heat.

“I felt wonderful about us winning one, two and three in ’66, but Ken Miles, we made a horrible decision in seeing the three cars come over exactly together. It was good politically for Ford, and I worked for Ford. And I’m not going to go against Henry Ford,” Shelby said.

Mangold’s film however suggests that Ford executive Leo Beebe (Josh Lucas) was the real villain and conspired to stage the photo finish, even though he knew it would mean Miles would lose. Throughout “Ford v Ferrari” he’s shown with a grudge against Miles and even goes over Shelby’s head with orders for the racers to drive more conservatively.

Also Read: But Beebe has been fairly vilified in real life, too. In “8 Meters,” it’s explained that Beebe was frustrated that Miles, McLaren and Amon were going above the speed the team had determined. In previous races, Ford cars crashed, exploded or failed to finish, so the priority was to keep both car and driver safe.

And according to the biography “Go Like Hell,” Beebe even received a handwritten note from Ford II that said, “You better win.” The stakes were high. Of course, the race didn’t go according to plan. We see in the movie that Miles was forced to pit after just one lap because his door wouldn’t close properly.

That really happened too. McLaren and Amon’s car then had tire problems, and McLaren famously shouted to Amon, “go like hell” and surpass the agreed-upon pace. According to “8 Meters,” Ford executives did eventually learn that a dead heat would not be allowed and there could be only one winner, but that was after they gave the order for Miles to slow down.

Once the mistake was realized, there was no way to communicate to Miles to speed up. Also Read: Had Miles won, he would’ve been the first driver to win the triple crown of Daytona, Sebring and Le Mans in a single year. But Miles died in a car wreck just two months after Le Mans, and history had forgotten his contributions to Ford until recently.

Now “Ford v Ferrari” helps to immortalize his legacy.

There aren’t a lot of things Hollywood loves more in a film than the retelling of true-to-life events or the onscreen portrayal of real people. For proof, look no further than what the Oscars each year: In the last 10 years, seven Best Actor winners played real people, including Rami Malek for “Bohemian Rhapsody.” “Hustlers” (Sept.13) STX Entertainment’s glitzy film about the Robin Hood of strippers is inspired by, “Hustlers” follows a crew of savvy strip club employees who band together to turn the tables on their wealthy and abusive Wall Street clientele by maxing out their credit cards after they’ve passed out. “Judy” (Sept.27) Renée Zellweger plays Judy Garland circa 1968, when “The Wizard of Oz” star arrived in London to perform in sell-out concerts. The film follows Garland as she prepares for the show, battles with management, charms musicians and reminisces with friends and adoring fans. Finn Wittrock, Jessie Buckley and Michael Gambon also star. “The Laundromat” (Sept.27) Steven Soderbergh’s screwball comedy follows Meryl Streep as a citizen journalist who uncovers a massive conspiracy involving money laundering, bribery, extortion. The film, based on Jake Bernstein’s book, “Secrecy World: Inside the Panama Papers Investigation of Illicit Money Networks and the Global Elite,” also stars Gary Oldman and Antonio Banderas. “The Current War” (Oct.25) The historical drama – which languished in limbo for nearly two years following The Weinstein Co.’s bankruptcy – tells the story of the cutthroat competition between Thomas Edison (Benedict Cumberbatch) and George Westinghouse (Michael Shannon) over whose electrical system would power the new century. Nicholas Hoult also stars as Nikola Tesla. “Lucy in the Sky” (Oct.4) “Fargo” and “Legion” creator Noah Hawley directed Natalie Portman in “Lucy in the Sky,” loosely based on the story of astronaut Lisa Nowak and her struggle to adjust after returning from space. Nowak, who was romantically involved with fellow astronaut William Oefelein, flew aboard Space Shuttle Discovery in July 2006. “Dolemite Is my Name” (Oct.25) Eddie Murphy returns to the screen after a three-year hiatus to play a blaxploitation legend whose given name is Rudy Ray Moore. After struggling to break into showbiz, Moore creates the alter-ego Dolemite seeking to star in blaxploitation films. “The Irishman” (Nov.1) Martin Scorsese reunites Robert De Niro and Al Pacino in what is one of the fall’s most-anticipated films: a decade-spanning saga of organized crime in post-WWII America that covers Jimmy Hoffa’s (Pacino) rise as the leader of the Teamsters, and Frank Sheeran’s (De Niro) participation in hits for the Bufalino crime family as well as the assassination of John F. “Harriet” (Nov.1) Cynthia Erivo, who had a breakout 2018 with films “Widows” and “Bad Times at the El Royale,” gets a star turn as American abolitionist and activist Harriet Tubman. The film follows the freedom fighter from her escape from slavery through her subsequent missions to free dozens of slaves in the South during a time of extreme adversity ahead of the Civil War. “The King” (Nov.1) Timothée Chalamet follows in the footsteps of Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh, to portray one of Shakespeare’s great heroes: Henry V, the 15th-century monarch who navigates the palace politics, chaos and war after his father’s premature death. Chalamet is backed by a great cast that includes Joel Edgerton, Sean Harris, Lily-Rose Depp, Robert Pattinson and Ben Mendelsohn. “Honey Boy” (Nov.8) “Honey Boy,” written by Shia LaBeouf, is a raw semiautobiographical retelling of the actor’s childhood growing up with an abusive and alcoholic father, played by LaBeouf. The actor wrote the screenplay while in rehab and reconciling with his father and confronting his own mental health issues. Noah Jupe plays a proxy for young Shia, here named Otis, while Lucas Hedges plays him as an adult. “Midway” (Nov.8) Roland Emmerich’s new action epic retells the clash between the American fleet and the Japanese imperial navy at the Battle of Midway in World War II. The cast includes Ed Skrein, Mandy Moore, Nick Jonas and Patrick Wilson. “Ford v Ferrari” (Nov.15) In a film that might as well be called “We Want an Oscar,” Matt Damon stars as visionary car designer Carroll Shelby opposite Christian Bale as the fearless British-born driver Kevin Miles. Back in 1966, the two men were hired by Ford to build a revolutionary race car to take on Enzo Ferrari at the 24 Hours of Le Mans race in France. “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood” (Nov.22) Tom Hanks plays the indelible Fred Rogers. Nothing else need be said. “The Two Popes” (Nov.27) Fernando Meirelles (“City of God”) this movie inspired the true story of Pope Benedict (Anthony Hopkins) and his encounter with the future Pope Francis (Jonathan Pryce), one of his harshest critics as a cardinal from Argentina. “The Aeronauts” (Dec.6) “The Theory of Everything” co-stars Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones re-team for another true story, about pioneering hot-air balloon pilot Amelia Wren (Jones) and meteorologist James Glaisher (Redmayne) who set out on an epic balloon journey in the 1860s. “Bombshell” (Dec.20) Jay Roach’s film tells the story of the sexual harassment scandal from the point of view of the women who challenged the toxic male culture and unseated Fox News founder Roger Ailes. Charlize Theron stars, in a striking resemblance to Megyn Kelly, alongside Nicole Kidman as Gretchen Carlson and Margot Robbie. “Just Mercy” (Dec.25) Michael B. Jordan stars as real-life author, activist and civil rights defense lawyer Bryan Stevenson as he seeks to free a wrongly convicted death-row inmate, Walter McMillian (Jamie Foxx). The film, which also stars Brie Larson, is directed by “Short Term 12” filmmaker Destin Cretton. “1917” (Dec.25) Oscar-winning director Sam Mendes based his WWI drama in part on an account from his paternal grandfather about two British soldiers ordered to sneak behind enemy lines to warn a battalion about an ambush during the third Battle of Ypres. “Clemency” (Dec.27) Chinonye Chukwu’s drama, which premiered in Sundance, is based on the true story of a death-row prison warden (Alfre Woodard) whose job takes its toll as she prepares for the execution of an inmate (Aldis Hodge).

There aren’t a lot of things Hollywood loves more in a film than the retelling of true-to-life events or the onscreen portrayal of real people. For proof, look no further than what the Oscars each year: In the last 10 years, seven Best Actor winners played real people, including Rami Malek for “Bohemian Rhapsody.” : ‘Ford v Ferrari’ Fact Check: Did Le Mans ’66 Really End That Way?
View full answer

What did Enzo Ferrari say to Henry Ford?

Ford vs. Ferrari: The Real Story Behind The Most Bitter Rivalry In Auto Racing History is full of famous rivalries, Most stem from a power grab or wounded pride—a few are a combination of the two. The best contentious relationships, however, are the ones that create the most legendary tales. Take the saga of how Henry Ford II—a.k.a., —attempted to acquire Ferrari in 1963, sparking a nearly decade-long feud between him and Enzo Ferrari, the strong-willed man that owned the Italian carmaker.

1. At its core, the Ferrari versus narrative—which gets in the new Ford v.
2. Ferrari movie starring academy award winners Matt Damon and Christian Bale—recounts a business deal gone wrong and the reaction of a stubborn, egotistical automotive titan who was willing spend some $25 million and thousands of engineering man-hours to avenge his pride.

To Ford, that meant beating Ferrari in the world’s most prestigious car race, the 24 Hours of Le Mans, which the Prancing Horse had historically dominated. The story begins in the early 1960s.U.S. purchasing habits changed as the Baby Boomer generation came of age.

For the first time in history, youth were more important to American business’ bottom line than their parents. Boomers had lots of disposable income to spend on items such as cars, clothes and homes, and unlike their “a penny saved is a penny earned” parents, who had lived through the Great Depression and World War II, they were looking for something unique from a,

They wanted cars that were sportier and sexier, valuing speed and performance over comfort and reliability. They wanted sports cars, a fact that was not lost on the executives at, In 1962, Ford was coming out of a major sales slide thanks to failed products like the and the growing popularity of rival products from GM and, The Rivals: The most famous and powerful CEO in America in the sixties, Henry Ford II (right), up against Enzo Ferrari, possible the most narcissistic man to walk the earth. MARKA / ALAMY STOCK PHOTO; ROGER VIOLLET/GETTY IMAGES There was just one problem: Ford didn’t have a sports car in its portfolio, and there were no plans to build one.

1. Iacocca’s legendarywas still a couple of years away from production.) It was decided that the most expedient way bring a vehicle to market would be to acquire one.
2. That’s when the idea was floated to purchase Ferrari, which in those years was primarily a race car company that sold street-legal machines only to fund its track exploits.

In the spring of 1963, after months of negotiation, an agreement seemed to be near. Ford would pay million to Enzo Ferrari for his company and all its assets. A former racer, Enzo was supposedly eager to put a deal together with a move that would relieve him of the burden of running the company day-to-day.

• But at the eleventh hour, Ferrari balked at a clause in the contract that said Ford would control the budget and, thus, all the decisions governing the Ferrari racing team.
• Enzo was unwilling to relinquish control of his company’s motorsports program.
• He told Ford’s representatives that he’d never sell under those terms—nor, he added, would he sell to an ugly company that builds ugly cars in an ugly factory.

It is rumored that he also insulted Henry II personally by insinuating that he couldn’t hold a candle to his grandfather, the real Henry Ford. To add even more insult to injury, Enzo then turned around and sold a majority stake in Ferrari to fellow Italian automaker, Triple Threat: While a trio of GT40 MK IIs passed the finish line in Le Mans together, none of the Ferraris even finished the race. To get his pound of flesh, the Deuce decided to build a sports car that would humiliate Ferrari where it mattered to him the most, the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

The seeds for the were sowed. Initially, the task of building the so-called Ferrari Killer was assigned to Ford’s Advanced Vehicles Group in the United Kingdom. They were already developing a vehicle that would use an engine created by experimental engine group, located in Dearborn, Michigan. While the first batch of GT40s to roll out of the Advance Vehicle Group were fast, they were also incredibly unstable and unreliable.

And the brakes were downright dangerous., Ford engineers calculated that when a driver hit the brakes at the end of Le Mans’ Mulsanne Straight, the front brake rotors would heat up to 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit within seconds, causing them to fail. This would prove to be disastrous—even deadly—for any driver trying to compete in northwestern France, even the best in the world.

Ultimately, the team couldn’t figure out how to make the cars stay firmly on the tarmac, let alone run continuously for 24 hours, two musts for a win in Le Mans. After losing to Ferrari at Le Mans in 1964 and 1965, Ford turned to the legendary Los Angeles car designer Carroll Shelby, one of the only American drivers to ever win at Le Mans, to run race operations.

Shelby (played in the movie by Matt Damon) was already a consultant on the project, but now he was in charge, responsible for its success—or failure. Lights, Cameras, Action: Academy-award winners Matt Damon (left) and Christian Bale play Carroll Shelby and Ken Miles, respectively, in the film. MERRICK MORTON After a challenging start, Shelby and his trusted friend, go-to test driver and engineering specialist Ken Miles (portrayed onscreen by Christian Bale), reinvented the GT40.

And they did so by collaborating with Advanced Vehicle Group and Ford’s experimental engine group, rather than starting from scratch. Shelby and Miles first improved the handling and stability of the vehicle by through flow testing. They taped wool streamers or tufts to the exterior of the car to see how air traveled over and around the vehicle.

The better a car cuts through the air, the less power is required to propel the vehicle, which also leads to less fuel consumption. If the yarn lay flat, all was good. If not, it indicated there were flaws in the car’s design that adversely affected downforce and stability.

• The data collected allowed Miles and Shelby to make body and suspension modifications that helped the GT40 be more stable and maneuverable on the track.
• The brake problem was solved by Phil Remington, an engineer on the team.
• He devised a quick-change brake system that allowed the mechanics to swap in new pads and rotors during a driver change, so the team didn’t have to worry about making the brakes last the entire race.

To address reliability issues, the team used a dynamometer. A standard practice today, putting an engine on a dyno, as it is commonly known, was revolutionary in the mid-sixties. A dynamometer is a device that can measure force, power, and speed—so you can figure out how much power you need or how much you have on hand. Ferrari versus Ford: The #2 GT40 Mk II piloted by Le Mans winner Bruce McLaren passe Richard Attwood in the #16 Ferrari 365 P2. The latter didn’t finish the race. UNIVERSAL IMAGES GROUP VIA GETTY All their hard work paid off, and the GT40 Mk. II was born.

didn’t just defeat Ferrari at Le Mans in 1966, it humiliated the Italian stallions. While Ferrari didn’t even have a car that completed the race, GT40 Mk. II’s captured first, second and third places. The finish wasn’t without controversy. Late in the race, Miles was well ahead of the competition, on his way to ending Ferrari’s dominance at Le Mans and becoming the only driver to win the world’s three biggest endurance race—the 24 hours of Daytona, 12 Hours of Sebring and 24 Hours of Le Mans—in the same year.

Ford’s PR guru Leo Beebe wanted to celebrate the win with a picture of the trio crossing the finish line together. So, he had Shelby order Miles to slow down and let the other GT40 teams catch up. After crossing the line, Miles was informed that he did not win the race.

His teammate Bruce McLaren did. McLaren started several cars behind Miles. So even though Miles was faster until the very end, McLaren actually traveled farther faster, because Miles intentionally slowed down. Sadly, Miles died before he could race at Le Mans again. Late in 1966, he was testing another race car at Riverside International Raceway in California when he lost control and crashed.

Miles did not survive the accident. The Deuce, meanwhile, got a second taste of vengeance the following year at Le Mans—a Ford GT40 Mk. IV built by Shelby (who died in 2012 at 89) won the 1967 race. Ferrari finished second. As for the Ford GT40, the great American supercar remains one of the most collectible automobiles in the world, with a sticker price that would blow back any driver’s hair.
View full answer

What cuss words are in Ford vs Ferrari?

There are some 15 exclamations of the British crudity ‘bloody,’ often used in combination with some other profanity. We also hear single uses of the words ‘b–locks,’ ‘pr-ck’ and ‘whore.’
View full answer

How many cuss words are in Ford vs Ferrari?

Ford v Ferrari Rating & Content Info – Why is Ford v Ferrari rated PG-13? Ford v Ferrari is rated PG-13 by the MPAA for some language and peril Violence: Two friends have a fight, involving pushing and punching. A man throws a wrench at another man. A man is locked into an office; his cries for help are ignored.

• Cars crash and catch on fire.
• People are shown on fire; no detail or injuries.
• A character dies.
• Sexual Content: A married couple kiss.
• Profanity: There are approximately 40 uses of profanity or crude language in this film, principally scatological curses, terms of deity, and crude anatomical expressions.

I heard one sexual expletive. An ethnic slur for Italians is used on one occasion. Alcohol / Drug Use: Main characters drink minor amounts of alcohol in social settings. A husband and wife drink beer together. A main character takes pills: we don’t know if they are prescribed or are being used appropriately.
View full answer

What car brand is F?

Ford Motor Company or simply called as Ford, is an American multinational automaker. It was founded by Henry Ford in 1903.
View full answer

Can a 10 year old drive a Lamborghini?

How Old Do You Have To Be To Drive A Lamborghini? Juniors aged between 10-17 years old will be able to strap in and experience the power and speed of a number of top Lamborghini models, such as the Lamborghini Gallardo, Huracan and Aventador, and all with no driving licence required.
View full answer

Can a 10 year old boy drive a car?

10 year old driving a Hyundai Creta is exactly what you don’t want your kids to do The legal age of driving a vehicle in India is 18 years old. This age might differ by a few years depending on the country but no country in the world legally allows a 10-year-old to drive on the public roads.

Sadly, in India, there are many young, underage kids who drive cars and ride motorcycles and they do it with the permission of their parents. Here is a video that shows a 10-year-old child driving a Hyundai Creta on the public roads. The child here has been portrayed as a hero of a song. The video shows the child driving around with an accomplice and that too on the public roads.

The car used in the video is a Hyundai Creta, which is not a small vehicle by any means. The child can be seen driving the vehicle around the town and taking narrow gaps too. He can also be seen taking the car in reverse and parking it in the garage. We are not sure if any trick shots have been used to shoot the video but it truly seems like the child is driving the vehicle around.

Also read: What the child has done here is quite commendable and his driving skills sure are appreciable. We don’t think many adults can do the same in a car. However, what he did is illegal and is extremely dangerous for himself and the other motorists on the road. This is not the first time that the kid handled a car for sure.

It seems like he has been practising driving a car and he did not seem to look nervous at all. The legal driving age in India is 18 years old and the authorities allow 16 years old to ride non-geared two-wheelers.
View full answer

Can an 8 year old ride a power wheel?

Power Wheels products with a maximum speed of around 6 mph are better suited to older children over 6-7 years old, while models that can reach speeds up to 2-3 mph per hour are ideal for toddlers.
View full answer

Is Ferrari a family car?

Ferrari’s Family Car: 4 Seats, 1 Trunk—and 800 Horsepower Sept.16, 2022 10:08 pm ET

Order Reprints Print Article

Illustration by Elias Stein It took a while, but has a family car, with four doors and four seats. The iconic Italian sports-car maker, famed for its black “prancing horse” logo, recently unveiled the Purosangue—Italian for thoroughbred—a crossover-sized model (think SUV), equipped with a V-12 engine capable of producing 800 horsepower.

The Purosangue will rocket the kids from zero to 60 miles per hour in about three seconds. But it’s not just about speed. The car’s aluminum frame includes hollow, thin-wall, aluminum castings to minimize weight and maximize handling. It’s still a Ferrari. Already a member? It took a while, but Ferrari has a family car, with four doors and four seats.

An error has occurred, please try again later. Thank you This article has been sent to : Ferrari’s Family Car: 4 Seats, 1 Trunk—and 800 Horsepower
View full answer

What age group buys Ferrari?

Whats the average age of a Ferrari owner? Tuesday 26th February 2013 The average Ferrari owners age is 52 (but coming down). It’s that high because the real big-boys that own for example, 5+ Ferrari’s or even 10+ Ferraris, and/or order an example of EVERY new model they release and/or own the older, heavyweight, expensive metal, tend to be in their their late 40’s-50’s.

1. In addition that age group is probably more representative, even for single Ferrari ownership, of the US market in particular which is still the biggest market.
2. It’s coming down though because the newer markets have younger owners.
3. Got to say, that the age you acquire your first one is typically a function of priorities at least as much as ££££.

Skewed priorities? Aaaaah. good times!!! (No I don’t work for Ferrari. Have met some high up people along the way, that do though) Tuesday 26th February 2013 So true regarding skewed priorities! Could have bought a few houses on a mortgage for what I “wasted” on cars in my early twenties. The way I saw it was you can’t buy memories, unless you believe total recall was a documentary. Tuesday 26th February 2013 mirage5512 said: The way I saw it was you can’t buy memories, unless you believe total recall was a documentary. Very good! I’m going to use that Tuesday 26th February 2013 456mgt said: mirage5512 said: The way I saw it was you can’t buy memories, unless you believe total recall was a documentary. Very good! I’m going to use that I’ve always espoused similar. You can always earn more money, you can never get your time/memories back. Tuesday 26th February 2013 SL55 said: Just bought my fourth Ferrari, a 458 Italia Coupe at the ripe old age of 71. Any advance on that? great work! Tuesday 26th February 2013 Porsche 993 at 32 Porsche 993 turbo at 33 360modena along with FFRR supercharged at 34 Porsche 997.1 GT3RS at 35 Challenge Stradale at 36.and now 37 and counting Tuesday 26th February 2013 911Thrasher said: Porsche 993 at 32 Porsche 993 turbo at 33 360modena along with FFRR supercharged at 34 Porsche 997.1 GT3RS at 35 Challenge Stradale at 36.and now 37 and counting Lets not start on histories otherwise this will turn into a real e-peen thread Tuesday 26th February 2013 iandc said: My God how did you get insurance!! I’d had two cars beforehand (one a convertible, one a turbo) with premiums of £3 and 2.5k.355 was about double that with a clean record, ncb and a hefty excess through a friend’s insurance company. A friend had a 1998 Vantage V600 as his first car. SL55 said: Just bought my fourth Ferrari, a 458 Italia Coupe at the ripe old age of 71. Any advance on that? THAT is the most impressive thing on this thread! BRILLIANT! Tuesday 26th February 2013 Murcielago_Boy said: THAT is the most impressive thing on this thread! BRILLIANT! Second that! Tuesday 26th February 2013 Craigwww said: Just bought my first F430 at 33. Already looking towards a 458 in a year’s time Craig, let me know if/when you do as I may be interested in buying the 430 back! Tuesday 26th February 2013 Bought my F355 at 51 Tuesday 26th February 2013 Murcielago_Boy said: The average Ferrari owners age is 52 (but coming down). Great to know that I’m under the average age to own my first Ferrari! – But only just!! Graham Tuesday 26th February 2013 “andrew” is too immature to own a Ferrari. You wouldn’t believe it to look at him though. He must just be one of life’s worriers Tuesday 26th February 2013 Murcielago_Boy said: The average Ferrari owners age is 52 (but coming down). It’s that high because the real big-boys that own for example, 5+ Ferrari’s or even 10+ Ferraris, and/or order an example of EVERY new model they release and/or own the older, heavyweight, expensive metal, tend to be in their their late 40’s-50’s.

In addition that age group is probably more representative, even for single Ferrari ownership, of the US market in particular which is still the biggest market. It’s coming down though because the newer markets have younger owners. Got to say, that the age you acquire your first one is typically a function of priorities at least as much as ££££.

Skewed priorities? Aaaaah. good times!!! (No I don’t work for Ferrari. Have met some high up people along the way, that do though) Many entrepreneurs I know only really started their companies at 30+,so you’d expect most Ferrari buyers to be 40+ I expect. Tuesday 26th February 2013 360 at 33, 430 Spider at 34. Now 37. Tuesday 26th February 2013 SL55 said: Just bought my fourth Ferrari, a 458 Italia Coupe at the ripe old age of 71. Any advance on that? talk to andrewd Midds 247 posts 221 months Tuesday 26th February 2013 Bought my first (550 Maranello) aged 31 Tuesday 26th February 2013 Bought 360 when I was 30. Tuesday 26th February 2013 GrahamPM said: Great to know that I’m under the average age to own my first Ferrari! – But only just!! Graham Spot on average for me Gassing Station | Supercar General | Top of Page | What’s New | My Stuff Posting Rules
View full answer

Is Ford vs Ferrari on Disney +?

Car designer Carroll Shelby and fearless driver Ken Miles take on Enzo Ferrari in Le Mans in 1966.
View full answer

Is Ford vs Ferrari a Disney movie?

Will Ford v Ferrari Be Available on Netflix or Hulu? – Ford v Ferrari is a 20th Century Fox movie, and the studio currently has a deal with HBO. That means Ford v Ferrari will not be available to stream on Netflix anytime in the foreseeable future. Ford v Ferrari is only available to stream on Hulu with the HBO Max add-on.
View full answer